Your message dated Sun, 2 Oct 2005 20:59:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FTBFS: Missing declaration inter alia
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2005 01:47:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 18:47:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ECp2F-0006k9-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 18:47:35 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233])
        (authenticated bits=0)
        by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j871lVeL055801
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 18:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
        (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1ECjHA-0001q9-Vr
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 12:38:37 -0700
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 12:38:36 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Missing declaration inter alia
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1067/Tue Sep  6 17:53:51 2005 on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: kdewebdev
Version: 3.3.2-6
Severity: serious

kdewebdev fails to build because MyProcess is not declared before it
is used, among other problems:

> if /bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=3Dcompile --tag=3DCXX g++ -DHAVE=
_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../kommander/widgets -I../.. -I../../../kommander/wid=
get -I../../../kommander/factory -I../../../kommander/plugin -I/usr/include=
/kde -I/usr/share/qt3/include -I.   -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT  -D_REENTRANT -DKOM=
MANDER -DDESIGNER -DQT_NO_SQL -DHAVE_KDE  -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long=
 -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=3D500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversio=
n -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -DNDEBUG -DNO_=
DEBUG -O2 -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exceptions -fno=
-check-new -fno-common -DENABLE_CVSSERVICE  -MT execbutton.lo -MD -MP -MF "=
=2Edeps/execbutton.Tpo" \
>   -c -o execbutton.lo `test -f '../../../kommander/widgets/execbutton.cpp=
' || echo '../../../kommander/widgets/'`../../../kommander/widgets/execbutt=
on.cpp; \
> then mv -f ".deps/execbutton.Tpo" ".deps/execbutton.Plo"; \
> else rm -f ".deps/execbutton.Tpo"; exit 1; \
> fi
> ../../../kommander/widgets/execbutton.h:73: error: 'MyProcess' has not be=
en declared
> ../../../kommander/widgets/execbutton.cpp:138: error: prototype for 'void=
 ExecButton::processExited(MyProcess*)' does not match any in class 'ExecBu=
tton'
> ../../../kommander/widgets/execbutton.h:73: error: candidate is: virtual =
void ExecButton::processExited(int*)

Adding a forward declaration

 class MyProcess;

to execbutton.h fixes this problem.  Unfortunately, the build still
fails with the following error:

> dh_install --sourcedir=3Ddebian/tmp --list-missing
> cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/share/apps/kafkapart': No such file or di=
rectory
> dh_install: command returned error code 256

--=20
Matt

--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDHfA8fNdgYxVXvBARAkX1AKCFXKhvCq5JnaDf3heXYCSDp4glHgCfSShk
g++4IDuQ37AasJuK5vWrL0k=
=qs2+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326998-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2005 18:59:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 02 11:59:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EM943-0006ht-00; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 11:59:59 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.53) 
          id 1EM93z-0003vD-DF
          for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:59:55 +0200
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 20:59:55 +0200
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FTBFS: Missing declaration inter alia
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Version: 4:3.4.2-1

* Matt Kraai [Tue, 06 Sep 2005 12:38:36 -0700]:

> Package: kdewebdev
> Version: 3.3.2-6
> Severity: serious

> kdewebdev fails to build because MyProcess is not declared before it
> is used, among other problems:

> > if /bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=3Dcompile --tag=3DCXX g++ -DHA=
VE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../kommander/widgets -I../.. -I../../../kommander/w=
idget -I../../../kommander/factory -I../../../kommander/plugin -I/usr/inclu=
de/kde -I/usr/share/qt3/include -I.   -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT  -D_REENTRANT -DK=
OMMANDER -DDESIGNER -DQT_NO_SQL -DHAVE_KDE  -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-lo=
ng -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=3D500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconvers=
ion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -DNDEBUG -DN=
O_DEBUG -O2 -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exceptions -f=
no-check-new -fno-common -DENABLE_CVSSERVICE  -MT execbutton.lo -MD -MP -MF=
 ".deps/execbutton.Tpo" \
> >   -c -o execbutton.lo `test -f '../../../kommander/widgets/execbutton.c=
pp' || echo '../../../kommander/widgets/'`../../../kommander/widgets/execbu=
tton.cpp; \
> > then mv -f ".deps/execbutton.Tpo" ".deps/execbutton.Plo"; \
> > else rm -f ".deps/execbutton.Tpo"; exit 1; \
> > fi
> > ../../../kommander/widgets/execbutton.h:73: error: 'MyProcess' has not =
been declared
> > ../../../kommander/widgets/execbutton.cpp:138: error: prototype for 'vo=
id ExecButton::processExited(MyProcess*)' does not match any in class 'Exec=
Button'
> > ../../../kommander/widgets/execbutton.h:73: error: candidate is: virtua=
l void ExecButton::processExited(int*)

> Adding a forward declaration

>  class MyProcess;

> to execbutton.h fixes this problem.  Unfortunately, the build still
> fails with the following error:

> > dh_install --sourcedir=3Ddebian/tmp --list-missing
> > cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/share/apps/kafkapart': No such file or =
directory
> > dh_install: command returned error code 256

  Current version in unstable does not exhibit this behavior, closing.

--=20
Adeodato Sim=C3=B3
    EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
    Listening to: Ellos - Mi remedio
=20
Q: How do Debian developers play Russian rulette?
A: Everone contributes a key revocation certificate and chooses a number
=66rom one to ten. Then everybody executes a random generator - if it's a
match, then his revocation certificate is submitted to the keyservers.
                -- seen on [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to