On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:18:49PM +0200, Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote:
Thanks for your response, Steve. It sounds very logical to me. Anyway,
I've cc'ed spender (grsec developper). It would be interesting if he
could add his comments here in this ticket since he's perhaps the more
Steve Langasek wrote:
See bugs 321720, 321721, 321723, and 321724 in the BTS. The bug in openssl
has been fixed in unstable, and that fix should soon propagate to testing; a
related bug was fixed in libacl1 before the sarge release.
Nice to see that these kind of bugs are being addressed.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 06:18:22PM +0200, Roman Medina wrote:
Package: kernel-patch-grsecurity2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Grsec patch is incompatible with glibc post-v.2.3.2.
I don't think that's actually true. From what I can tell, what happens
is that
Hello,
Thanks for your response, Steve. It sounds very logical to me. Anyway,
I've cc'ed spender (grsec developper). It would be interesting if he
could add his comments here in this ticket since he's perhaps the more
capable person to answer grsec issues. Perhaps he can refute some of
your
Package: kernel-patch-grsecurity2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Grsec patch is incompatible with glibc post-v.2.3.2. More info:
http://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?t=1152
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/08/msg00747.html
-- System Information:
Debian
5 matches
Mail list logo
