On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:02:43PM -0400, pryzbyj wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:54:35PM +0300, Harri J?rvi wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Linuxsampler is packaged in debian unstable.
> >
> > It would seem to me that Linuxsampler currently is not compatible with
> > DFSG.
> Agree.
> I'm filing a
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:54:35PM +0300, Harri Järvi wrote:
[...]
> The problem is that the README in linuxsampler says the following thing:
>
> "This software is distributed under the GNU General Public License (see
> COPYING file), and may not be used in commercial applications without
> asking
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 16:26:15 +0200, Göran Weinholt wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:54:35PM +0300, Harri Järvi wrote:
> > In addition there's a conflict between linuxsampler's aim to be an
> > opensource software, and the license used. Restricting commercial use
> > makes the software nonop
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 08:03:46AM +0300, Harri Järvi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 16:26:15 +0200, Göran Weinholt wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:54:35PM +0300, Harri Järvi wrote:
>
> > > In addition there's a conflict between linuxsampler's aim to be an
> > > opensource software, and th
I have contacted the author and am waiting to see whether he will change
the license. If not then we will either remove or move it to non-free.
Matt
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:50:12AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 08:03:46AM +0300, Harri J?rvi wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 200
> That is indeed non-free and fails DFSG #6, the package cannot
> be in main, but could be in non-free maybe.
No, this is really an additional restriction over the GPL, thus
rendering the software undistributable for everyone but the
original author.
--
HTH,
massa
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:50:12 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> That is indeed non-free and fails DFSG #6, the package cannot be in main, but
> could be in non-free maybe.
It has come to my attention that released Linuxsampler versions up to
the latest release 0.3.3 are licensed purely under the GPL
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 10:31:30AM +0300, Harri Järvi wrote:
> It has come to my attention that released Linuxsampler versions up to
> the latest release 0.3.3 are licensed purely under the GPL. The
> "NON COMMERCIAL"-exception has been added to the cvs version and is
> reflected on the homepage
Hello Matt,
Have you thought about what to do about the linux sampler license
problem, bug #328121 [0]?
--
Clear skies,
Justin
References
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=328121
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
OK - no worries,
I will hang tight to hear if Chris replies to you Paul.
Matt
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 03:58:44AM +0100, Paul Brossier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:36:37PM +1000, Matt Flax wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > yes I was thinking about removing it from the Debian release sys
Hi all,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:36:37PM +1000, Matt Flax wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yes I was thinking about removing it from the Debian release system.
>
> What about you Paul ?
I have sent a private email with Christian. I am still hoping that he
changes the README file in the CVS. Let's give him a
11 matches
Mail list logo
