Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:32:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329487: fixed in xmpi 2.2.3b8-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 04:29:20 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 21:29:20 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp2.stanford.edu [171.67.16.125] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIIi0-0003Kx-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:29:20 -0700 Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147]) by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8M4TJ71028130 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:29:19 -0700 Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 05FDDE7DDB; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xmpi: needs rebuild for lam transition X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:29:18 -0700 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xmpi Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Due to C++ libraries in the package, lam had to change shared library package names as part of the C++ transition. rmpi now needs to be rebuilt with the new version of lam so that it can migrate into testing. Please upload a new version of rmpi with a versioned build-depends on: lam4-dev (>= 7.1.1-3.2) This is necessary since m68k has not yet built the new lam; otherwise, the new upload may get built against the old lam libraries on that platform. If you can get to this soon, that would be best, as all of lam, hdf5, and mpich are currently caught up in a large transition. Thanks! -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.30 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) --------------------------------------- Received: (at 329487-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 14:39:05 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 07:39:05 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENtGb-00011B-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:32:09 -0700 From: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329487: fixed in xmpi 2.2.3b8-9 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:32:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xmpi Source-Version: 2.2.3b8-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xmpi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libxmpi4-dev_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xmpi/libxmpi4-dev_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb libxmpi4_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xmpi/libxmpi4_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb xmpi_2.2.3b8-9.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xmpi/xmpi_2.2.3b8-9.diff.gz xmpi_2.2.3b8-9.dsc to pool/main/x/xmpi/xmpi_2.2.3b8-9.dsc xmpi_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xmpi/xmpi_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xmpi package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:21:22 +0000 Source: xmpi Binary: libxmpi4-dev libxmpi4 xmpi Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.2.3b8-9 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: libxmpi4 - A graphical user interface for MPI program development libxmpi4-dev - A graphical user interface for MPI program development xmpi - A graphical user interface for MPI program development Closes: 329487 Changes: xmpi (2.2.3b8-9) unstable; urgency=low . * Rebuild against latest lam for C++ transition, Closes: #329487. * newer standards Files: 475d070c82064514d78c88f14cc9cdc8 645 devel optional xmpi_2.2.3b8-9.dsc 9161218571a08edfefa6e9804d424ddf 85033 devel optional xmpi_2.2.3b8-9.diff.gz 08365df522fbbe0a874b62fa855d35ac 95594 devel extra xmpi_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb 3a8843ffe33a752b1ece021e1e567421 36738 libs optional libxmpi4_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb 4cd497a4ee347f3ea3d19b0413814c3a 91680 libdevel optional libxmpi4-dev_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDRoSjczG1wFfwRdwRAjzcAJ92hX+JzEFRbQ6jqv6tZwtf/hvlswCgjVh1 E4ixEUnJudX2jfR2/TW2yTg= =ASDK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]