On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:14:59PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> The culprit is clearly the only Debian patch included in the 1.1.1-2
> klibc source package (debian/patches//klibc-sparc64-signals.diff). It
> looks like it's just a leftover from some previous version, at least the
> patch header m
Hi,
The culprit is clearly the only Debian patch included in the 1.1.1-2
klibc source package (debian/patches//klibc-sparc64-signals.diff). It
looks like it's just a leftover from some previous version, at least the
patch header mentions 1.0.14, which does not match the current version. If
I
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:21:10PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > severity 330191 serious
> > thanks
> >
> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Blars Blarson wrote:
> >
> > > klibc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
> > > pbuilder. It also failed on some othe
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > adding cc to debian-kernel to investigate the mips/mipsel failure:
> > E: Couldn't find package linux-headers-2.6.12-1
>
> The mips/mipsel packages are only in experimental ATM. I hope to
> prepare an unstable upload t
maximilian attems wrote:
> severity 330191 serious
> thanks
>
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Blars Blarson wrote:
>
> > klibc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
> > pbuilder. It also failed on some other buildds.
>
> thanks for your report and duplicating, will look into it.
>
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 330191 serious
Bug#330191: klibc: ftbfs [sparc] redefinition of 'struct __new_sigaction'
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
6 matches
Mail list logo
