tags 333915 patch
thanks
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 02:20:27PM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
I don't think so. librrd2 is not backwards compatible to librrd0, so it is
not as simple as updating the build dependency.
Hi,
the API change in librrd2 is minimal. I'm attaching a patch for this.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 333915 patch
Bug#333915: Unsatisfiable build dep on librrd0-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
Hi Luk @2005.10.14_14:10:42_+0200
Hi
I don't think so. librrd2 is not backwards compatible to librrd0, so it is
not as simple as updating the build dependency.
That may be the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: orca
Severity: serious
Version: 0.2.3
Hi
Please update your build dependency on librrd0-dev to librrd2-dev
Cheers
Luk
- --
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999
Hi Luk @2005.10.14_14:10:42_+0200
I don't think so. librrd2 is not backwards compatible to librrd0, so it is
not as simple as updating the build dependency.
Also, librrd0-dev is still in Debian for that very reason.
If you don't have any objection to
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 02:20:27PM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
Hi Luk @2005.10.14_14:10:42_+0200
I don't think so. librrd2 is not backwards compatible to librrd0, so it is
not as simple as updating the build dependency.
Also, librrd0-dev is
6 matches
Mail list logo