Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2006-06-02 Thread Brendan O'Dea
reassign 335105 kernel close 335105 2.6.5 thanks On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 10:24:56AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: My bet is that it's this kernel bug: I don't know if you've been following, but it was recently discoverd that on smp, if multiple processes read from /dev/urandom at the same

Processed: Re: Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 335105 kernel Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork Bug reassigned from package `perl' to `kernel'. close 335105 2.6.5 Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2005-12-12 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Andrew Suffield wrote: [snip] Hm, it is easily reproducible on SWARM, as well as on a Octane with 2 CPUs. Which probably means it is a SMP-induced race condition in fork. My bet is that it's this kernel bug: I don't know if you've been following, but it was recently discoverd that on

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2005-12-12 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Thiemo Seufer said: Andrew Suffield wrote: [snip] Hm, it is easily reproducible on SWARM, as well as on a Octane with 2 CPUs. Which probably means it is a SMP-induced race condition in fork. My bet is that it's this kernel bug: I don't know if

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2005-12-11 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 07:39:04PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: Andrew Suffield wrote: This doesn't look like #223110 to me - that bug is specific to signal handlers. After a closer look I agree. I just tried the test on casals against 5.8.7-6 though, and I can't get it to break

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2005-12-10 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Andrew Suffield wrote: This doesn't look like #223110 to me - that bug is specific to signal handlers. After a closer look I agree. I just tried the test on casals against 5.8.7-6 though, and I can't get it to break (although it is still breaking on the buildd). What do you know about

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2005-12-09 Thread Andrew Suffield
This doesn't look like #223110 to me - that bug is specific to signal handlers. I just tried the test on casals against 5.8.7-6 though, and I can't get it to break (although it is still breaking on the buildd). What do you know about it? I need to duplicate the pesky thing somehow... --

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2005-10-28 Thread Thiemo Seufer
This is probably caused by glibc's #223110. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2005-10-21 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Package: perl Version: 5.8.7-7 Severity: serious According to http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=perlarch=mipsver=5.8.7-7stamp=1129566720file=log perl fails for the t/op/fork test on mips. I tried to reproduce it and found that the test succeeds with a probability of ~50% for a locally built