Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:18:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339872: fixed in rpm2html 1.9.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2005 13:12:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 19 05:12:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EdSVy-0004Ai-5s
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 05:12:22 -0800
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148])
        by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FC870527;
        Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:10:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-13-99.mnet-online.de [82.135.13.99])
        by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D123136911;
        Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:12:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4AC1033FA4E;
        Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:12:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rpm2html: FTBFS: rpmopen.c:857: undefined reference to 
`rpmBuildFileList'
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:12:20 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: rpm2html
Version: 1.8.1-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

building the package rpm2html in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:

=========================================================================
[...]
rpmopen.c:1510: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'xmlStrdup' 
differ in signedness
rpmopen.c:1510: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
rpmopen.c: In function 'rpmDirScanAll':
rpmopen.c:1591: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'xmlStrdup' 
differ in signedness
rpmopen.c:1591: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
rpmopen.c:1593: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'xmlStrdup' 
differ in signedness
rpmopen.c:1593: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
rpmopen.c:1595: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'xmlStrdup' 
differ in signedness
rpmopen.c:1595: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
rpmopen.c:1597: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'xmlStrdup' 
differ in signedness
rpmopen.c:1597: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
rpmopen.c:1599: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'xmlStrdup' 
differ in signedness
rpmopen.c:1599: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
rpmopen.c:1601: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'xmlStrdup' 
differ in signedness
rpmopen.c:1601: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
rpmopen.c:1603: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'xmlStrdup' 
differ in signedness
rpmopen.c:1603: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
rpmopen.c:1605: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'xmlStrdup' 
differ in signedness
rpmopen.c:1605: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I. -I. -g -O2 -I/usr/include/libxml2 
-I/usr/include/rpm     -g -O2 -c `test -f 'stringbuf.c' || echo './'`stringbuf.c
stringbuf.c: In function 'stringAdd':
stringbuf.c:168: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'xmlStrdup' 
differ in signedness
stringbuf.c:168: warning: pointer targets in return differ in signedness
gcc  -g -O2   -o rpm2html  cleanup.o config.o html.o language.o memory.o 
rdf_api.o rdf.o rpm2html.o rpmdata.o rpmopen.o stringbuf.o -L/usr/lib -lxml2 
-lz -lm -lrpm -lrpm -lrpmdb -lrpmio -lpopt -ldb -lz  -lbz2 -lrpm -lrpm -lrpmdb 
-lrpmio -lpopt -ldb -lz  -lbz2
rpmopen.o: In function `rpmAnalyze':/tmp/buildd/rpm2html-1.8.1/rpmopen.c:857: 
undefined reference to `rpmBuildFileList'
rpmopen.o: In function `rpmOpen':/tmp/buildd/rpm2html-1.8.1/rpmopen.c:1023: 
undefined reference to `rpmReadPackageHeader'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [rpm2html] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/rpm2html-1.8.1'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
=========================================================================

Thanks for considering.


--
DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite
http://darts.alioth.debian.org/

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 339872-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 18:21:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 10:21:56 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Ew1at-0001Ns-T7; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:18:11 -0800
From: Angel Ramos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#339872: fixed in rpm2html 1.9.2-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:18:11 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: rpm2html
Source-Version: 1.9.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rpm2html, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rpm2html_1.9.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rpm2html/rpm2html_1.9.2-1.diff.gz
rpm2html_1.9.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rpm2html/rpm2html_1.9.2-1.dsc
rpm2html_1.9.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rpm2html/rpm2html_1.9.2-1_i386.deb
rpm2html_1.9.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/r/rpm2html/rpm2html_1.9.2.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Angel Ramos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rpm2html package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  9 Jan 2006 18:41:12 +0100
Source: rpm2html
Binary: rpm2html
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.9.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Angel Ramos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Angel Ramos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 rpm2html   - Generate HTML index from directories of RPMs
Closes: 339872 342429
Changes: 
 rpm2html (1.9.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   * Solved undefined reference to pmBuildFileList' (Closes: #339872).
   * Updated config.guess and config.sub (Closes: #342429).
Files: 
 3284088dbd4978b8f25bf0d88fd4350a 602 web extra rpm2html_1.9.2-1.dsc
 f74eb7631060ebd334aae14d6c60810e 180462 web extra rpm2html_1.9.2.orig.tar.gz
 54aebdb696cee83ab538f5f954719b1e 34536 web extra rpm2html_1.9.2-1.diff.gz
 b54396ea49e8cecc426ded9c3c146929 60724 web extra rpm2html_1.9.2-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDwqZdoSMQNVMgBdoRAiHqAJsGbeCSR/NC/08xUQQy4sIAwdxrrgCeKlNF
PeRVaIh4/8u+bDz7Xt0kuvQ=
=rtRl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to