Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

2006-01-06 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 14:22:21 +0800 LUK ShunTim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As you said, there is no secret at all. :-) I noticed - that's why I responded through the list. > Your opinion is noted and this will be the last you hear (directly) > fr

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

2006-01-05 Thread LUK ShunTim
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:55:07 +0800 > LUK ShunTim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>I did *not* cc the bug list as the email is quite large, over 100k. > > > Please do not post me privately about non-secret bugs. I have a strong > interest in working in the open. Hello

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

2006-01-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:55:07 +0800 LUK ShunTim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did *not* cc the bug list as the email is quite large, over 100k. Please do not post me privately about non-secret bugs. I have a strong interest in working in the open. I

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

2006-01-04 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:28:04 +0100 Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:50:15PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote: > > > > This is triggered when I try to use reportbug to report a kernel > > bug. > > ok reportbug checks i

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

2006-01-04 Thread Maximilian Attems
hello luk! On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:50:15PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote: > > This is triggered when I try to use reportbug to report a kernel bug. ok reportbug checks if there are debsums for a packet, currently we don't add them so i'm still curious where do you get them from? please post the o

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

2006-01-04 Thread LUK ShunTim
Maximilian Attems wrote: > severity 343686 normal > tags 343686 moreinfo > tags 343686 unreproducible > stop > > downgrading severity as kernel-package doesn't yet build with debsums. > > can you please tell how you hooked debsums into your image? > perhaps you are invoking debsums in apt's post

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

2005-12-17 Thread Maximilian Attems
reassign kernel-package stop On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:48:55PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 > Version: 2.6.14+2.6.15-rc5-0experimental.1 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > > After installing linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 and rebooting,

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

2005-12-17 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, LUK ShunTim said: > However, the strange thing is when I invoke reportbug to report it, I got > these > bunch of checksum errors > > > Getting status for linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686... > Verifying package integrity... > There may be a problem with your installation

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

2005-12-17 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 Version: 2.6.14+2.6.15-rc5-0experimental.1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system After installing linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 and rebooting, I got errors similar to that reported in bug #343048, that is /bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/dev: No such