Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Norbert, hi all, > > Most of the work on tetex-doc-nonfree was done before the GR on GFDL. At > that time, it seemed pretty clear that any GFDL licensed document would > have to go to non-free. Most of the discussion is in #345604. After the > unexpected outcome of the GR, I am not sure if we should jump to > conclusions already and move the files back.
What else do you suggest? Do you expect any statement (e.g. by ftp-master) with respect to "GFDL/Debian free" documents? Technically speaking, I don't think there's a good reason to keep them out of tetex-doc (and they are still in the tetex-base tarball, which is not yet repackaged). Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
