Bug#346957: libsdl1.2: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev

2006-01-15 Thread Lawrence Williams
Hello, I am going to try and package an updated version today. I was also working on reworking the SDL packaging to make it cleaner. Maybe someone is interested in sponsoring that as well? Darn, I need to start working on becoming a DD and do my own uploads :) Thanks Lawrence On Tuesday 10

Bug#346957: libsdl1.2: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev

2006-01-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:44:05AM -0330, Lawrence Williams wrote: Thank you for the report Mr. Simo. I can do a new release if I can find a sponsor. Would you be willing to help? FWIW, I have a standing offer of sponsorship for any packages that fix RC bugs, as long as the packages pass my

Bug#346957: libsdl1.2: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev

2006-01-10 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Lawrence Williams [Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:44:05 -0330]: Hello, Hi, Thank you for the report Mr. Simo. I can do a new release if I can find a sponsor. Would you be willing to help? In case of RC bugs, it's easy to find sponsors. I recommend that you produce a new version, and mention the

Bug#346957: libsdl1.2: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev

2006-01-09 Thread Lawrence Williams
Hello, Thank you for the report Mr. Simo. I can do a new release if I can find a sponsor. Would you be willing to help? Thanks Lawrence On Sunday 08 January 2006 22:08, Adeodato Simó wrote: Package: libsdl1.2 Version: 1.2.9-0.0 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed

Bug#346957: libsdl1.2: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev

2006-01-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
Package: libsdl1.2 Version: 1.2.9-0.0 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1]