Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64

2006-03-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Anders Brandt Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You're welcome I'm glad that I can help :-) > I've now compiled two new versions (gcc 3.4 and 4.0) - and I've been able > to play several games in both versions without any Segfaults - > Thanks a lot. Excellent. New upload will be coming shor

Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64

2006-03-10 Thread Anders Brandt Petersen
Russ Allbery wrote: Could you try this patch in addition to the previous one? Index: gnubg.c === --- gnubg.c (revision 348) +++ gnubg.c (working copy) @@ -8971,7 +8971,8 @@ #if HAVE_ICONV iconv_t id; - int lIn, lOut, l,

Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64

2006-03-09 Thread Russ Allbery
Anders Brandt Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've done a test build and now it first segfaults when I say Ok to > create a new game. > I therefore created 2 builds one gcc/g++ pointing to version 4.0 and one > pointing to 3.4 - did'nt know whichone to use. Anyway both gave the same > resu

Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64

2006-03-09 Thread Anders Brandt Petersen
Russ Allbery wrote: Aha. I bet there was never a problem with Guile at all. Would it be possible for you to apply a patch and rebuild the package as a test? I think this patch will fix the segfaults: Index: board3d/misc3d.c ===

Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64

2006-03-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Anders Brandt Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It is not linked to guile. > Below is a new backtrace: Thanks! > (gdb) bt > #0 0x0050b59f in calculateEigthPoints () > #1 0x00506bf4 in preDraw3d () Aha. I bet there was never a problem with Guile at all. Would it be poss

Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64

2006-03-07 Thread Anders Brandt Petersen
Russ Allbery wrote: tags 350390 = help thanks Anders Brandt Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Russ Allbery wrote: Help from the AMD64 porters tracked the problem apparently down to Guile. I've just uploaded a new version of gnubg that doesn't build with Guile support on AMD64

Processed: Re: Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64

2006-03-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 350390 = help Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64 Tags were: pending Tags set to: help > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64

2006-03-07 Thread Russ Allbery
tags 350390 = help thanks Anders Brandt Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Russ Allbery wrote: >> Help from the AMD64 porters tracked the problem apparently down to >> Guile. I've just uploaded a new version of gnubg that doesn't build >> with Guile support on AMD64. When 0.14.3-4 makes it

Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64

2006-03-06 Thread Anders Brandt Petersen
Russ Allbery wrote: tags 350390 = pending thanks Help from the AMD64 porters tracked the problem apparently down to Guile. I've just uploaded a new version of gnubg that doesn't build with Guile support on AMD64. When 0.14.3-4 makes it into the archives for AMD64, could you check to see if thi

Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64

2006-03-04 Thread Russ Allbery
tags 350390 = pending thanks Help from the AMD64 porters tracked the problem apparently down to Guile. I've just uploaded a new version of gnubg that doesn't build with Guile support on AMD64. When 0.14.3-4 makes it into the archives for AMD64, could you check to see if this fixes the problem for

Processed: Re: Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 350390 = pending Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64 Tags were: help upstream Tags set to: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis