On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 12:00:45PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> On 2/9/06, Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:32:15AM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> > > Good catch, I completely forgot about that one, I thought it was
> > > already merged in.
> > Thibaut, the
On 2/9/06, Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:32:15AM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> > Good catch, I completely forgot about that one, I thought it was
> > already merged in.
>
> Thibaut, there is something strange about this bugreport, it seems
> to prevent glibc
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:32:15AM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> Good catch, I completely forgot about that one, I thought it was
> already merged in.
Thibaut, there is something strange about this bugreport, it seems
to prevent glibc 2.3.5-13 from entering testing, even if it is
tagged "etch,sid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 350501 + patch
Bug#350501: nscd: [hppa] error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc
type 0x42
Tags were: sid etch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
On 2/9/06, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tag 350501 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> The problem is that since version all network daemons, including nscd,
> are built with -fPIE, thanks to RedHat. GCC treats this flag just as
I'm quite worried that RH dictates how free software gets bui
tag 350501 + patch
thanks
Hi,
The problem is that since version all network daemons, including nscd,
are built with -fPIE, thanks to RedHat. GCC treats this flag just as
-fPIC, but binutils generates relocs of type R_PARISC_PLABEL14 and
R_PARISC_PLABEL21. Glibc does not handle those relocs.
Cur
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 350501 etch sid
Bug#350501: nscd: [hppa] error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc
type 0x42
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch, sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
tags 350501 etch sid
thanks
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:59:30 +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> Package: nscd
> Version: 2.3.5-8
> Followup-For: Bug #350501
>
> FYI, I successfully reproduced this bug on another machine running
> etch (and running a 32bit kernel):
Tagging this RC bug with "etch sid", I a
Package: nscd
Version: 2.3.5-12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
nscd won't start on hppa, throwing the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# nscd -d
nscd: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc type 0x42
I can't tell yet whether this is 64bit-related (i'll
9 matches
Mail list logo
