On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:17:51PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I agree. Moreover, manpages from manpages-dev are DFSG compliant whereas
> ones from glibc-doc are not. Therefore I suggest to upload a new
> manpages-dev package with a conflict on glibc-doc << 2.3.6-7.
Replaces: glibc-doc (<< 2.
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:58:40PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:17:51PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I agree. Moreover, manpages from manpages-dev are DFSG compliant whereas
> > ones from glibc-doc are not. Therefore I suggest to upload a new
> > manpages-dev pack
Denis Barbier wrote:
reassign 365547 manpages-dev,glibc-doc
thanks
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:22:29AM +0200, Roberto Pariset wrote:
Hello,
I wish glibc mantainers could take a look at #365547 and eventually decide
together with Michael Kerrisk what to do about this manpage conflict.
As these
reassign 365547 manpages-dev,glibc-doc
thanks
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:22:29AM +0200, Roberto Pariset wrote:
> Hello,
> I wish glibc mantainers could take a look at #365547 and eventually decide
> together with Michael Kerrisk what to do about this manpage conflict.
As these manual pages have
Hello,
I wish glibc mantainers could take a look at #365547 and eventually decide
together with Michael Kerrisk what to do about this manpage conflict.
Thanks,
Roberto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5 matches
Mail list logo