reopen 368883
thanks
* debian/patches/17_alpha_ice.dpatch: new patch from Steve Langasek to
fix FTBFS on alpha (Closes: #368883)
(urgency set to high for that fix).
sigh Except that, by adding in the new upstream release at the same time,
qt4-x11 is now hitting the same error in a
Hi,
Could this be fixed any time soon? qt4-x11 is currently blocking no
less than 83 packages.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 368883 + pending
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database
tag 368883 + pending
thanks
Le Sam 3 Juin 2006 10:57, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
Hi,
Could this be fixed any time soon? qt4-x11 is currently blocking no
less than 83 packages.
Samuel
that one is quite annoying.
Brian: will you have time to fix that soon (like in less than a couple
of
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
tag 368883 + pending
thanks
Le Sam 3 Juin 2006 10:57, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
Hi,
Could this be fixed any time soon? qt4-x11 is currently blocking no
less than 83 packages.
Samuel
that one is quite annoying.
Brian: will you have time to
tags 368883 patch
thanks
So, having diagnosed that this is an interaction between
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden and referencing inlined methods (bug #369642),
the obvious workaround is to keep the problematic methods from getting
inlined.
The attached patch should do this; unfortunately, I haven't
clone 368883 -1
reassign -1 g++-4.0
severity -1 important
thanks
This ICE also happens with g++-4.1 and gcc-snapshot.
Working on a minimal test case.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
Package: qt4-x11
Version: 4.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
gcc ICEd when attempting to build qt4-x11 on alpha on 2006-05-14. I
don't know what's the issue and what could fix. However, 4.1.2-1 built
and the changes to -2 seem minimal, so it should be easy to
Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
gcc ICEd when attempting to build qt4-x11 on alpha on 2006-05-14. I
don't know what's the issue and what could fix. However, 4.1.2-1 built
and the changes to -2 seem minimal, so it should be easy to check
whether there was a gcc regression or the
Brian Nelson a écrit :
Isn't an ICE always a compiler bug?
Yes, I was just asking if it was a new bug or a pre-existing one.
In any case, nothing in the Qt code
changed between -1 and -2, so it's certainly a GCC regression.
Thanks for the information...I guess that's bad news. It seems
Le Jeu 25 Mai 2006 22:30, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
Brian Nelson a écrit :
Isn't an ICE always a compiler bug?
Yes, I was just asking if it was a new bug or a pre-existing one.
In any case, nothing in the Qt code
changed between -1 and -2, so it's certainly a GCC regression.
Thanks for
11 matches
Mail list logo
