Bug#375967: Acknowledgement (Segfaults)

2006-06-29 Thread Anton Ivanov
Thomas Girard wrote: >Selon Anton Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >>famd: NetConnection.c++:252: void NetConnection::flush(): Assertion `ret >>== omsgList->len' failed. >> >>Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. >>0xb7def83b in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 >> >> > >Great. And what

Bug#375967: Acknowledgement (Segfaults)

2006-06-29 Thread Thomas Girard
Selon Anton Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > famd: NetConnection.c++:252: void NetConnection::flush(): Assertion `ret > == omsgList->len' failed. > > Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. > 0xb7def83b in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 Great. And what does `bt full' give you then ?

Bug#375967: Acknowledgement (Segfaults)

2006-06-29 Thread Anton Ivanov
Thomas Girard wrote: >Selon Anton Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >>I tried to run it under gdb without success. It gets a signal 33 after a >>while which I think is actually a GDB artefact. >> >>Any ideas on how to debug this will be appreciated. >> >> > >If this is *really* an artefact y

Bug#375967: Acknowledgement (Segfaults)

2006-06-29 Thread Thomas Girard
Selon Anton Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I tried to run it under gdb without success. It gets a signal 33 after a > while which I think is actually a GDB artefact. > > Any ideas on how to debug this will be appreciated. If this is *really* an artefact you can use handle SIG33 noprint nostop. H

Bug#375967: Acknowledgement (Segfaults)

2006-06-29 Thread Anton Ivanov
I tried to run it under gdb without success. It gets a signal 33 after a while which I think is actually a GDB artefact. Any ideas on how to debug this will be appreciated. -- Understanding is a three-edged sword: your side, their side, and the truth. --Kosh Naranek A. R. Ivanov E-m