Package: dovecot-common
Version: 1.0.rc1-1
Severity: grave
File: /usr/sbin/dovecot
I upgraded from 1.0beta9-1 to 1.0rc1-1, and was immediately unable to contact
the IMAP server. I tried starting it by hand, both by executing
"/etc/init.d/dovecot start" as well as by running start-stop-daemon by h
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Neil Roeth wrote:
Package: dovecot-common
Version: 1.0.rc1-1
Severity: grave
File: /usr/sbin/dovecot
I upgraded from 1.0beta9-1 to 1.0rc1-1, and was immediately unable to contact
the IMAP server. I tried starting it by hand, both by executing
"/etc/init.d/dovecot start" as
On Jun 30, Jaldhar H. Vyas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Neil Roeth wrote:
>
> > Package: dovecot-common
> > Version: 1.0.rc1-1
> > Severity: grave
> > File: /usr/sbin/dovecot
> >
> > I upgraded from 1.0beta9-1 to 1.0rc1-1, and was immediately unable to
> > contact
>
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Neil Roeth wrote:
Thanks for the quick response.
I see this in /tmp/dovecot.log, which is what I had log_path set to in
dovecot.conf for a while:
dovecot: 2006-06-28 23:02:29 Error: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): utimes() failed
with mbox file /var/mail/virtual_mailboxes/athen
On Jun 30, Jaldhar H. Vyas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Neil Roeth wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks for the quick response.
> >
> > I see this in /tmp/dovecot.log, which is what I had log_path set to in
> > dovecot.conf for a while:
> >
> > dovecot: 2006-06-28 23:02:29 Error:
strace output is attached.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/init.d# strace /usr/sbin/dovecot
execve("/usr/sbin/dovecot", ["/usr/sbin/dovecot"], [/* 26 vars */]) = 0
uname({sys="Linux", node="ml330", ...}) = 0
brk(0) = 0x8067ffc
access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap", F_OK) = -1 EN
On sab, 01 lug 2006, Neil Roeth wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
> strace output is attached.
Hi Neil,
could you please run again strace with the "-f" switch, in order to trace
the child process too?
Thanks,
Fabio
--
Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.i
On Jul 2, Fabio Tranchitella ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On sab, 01 lug 2006, Neil Roeth wrote:
>
> Content-Description: message body text
> > strace output is attached.
>
> Hi Neil,
> could you please run again strace with the "-f" switch, in order to trace
> the child process too?
>From the strace output I just sent, it appears that the child process is
failing to find the function epoll_create(), which a quick Google shows is a
function introduced in Linux kernel 2.5.44. I suppose it's relevant that I am
running a 2.4 kernel. :-)
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 08:32 -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> >From the strace output I just sent, it appears that the child process is
> failing to find the function epoll_create(), which a quick Google shows is a
> function introduced in Linux kernel 2.5.44. I suppose it's relevant that I am
> running
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Neil Roeth wrote:
From the strace output I just sent, it appears that the child process is
failing to find the function epoll_create(), which a quick Google shows is a
function introduced in Linux kernel 2.5.44. I suppose it's relevant that I am
running a 2.4 kernel. :-)
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Neil Roeth wrote:
On Jul 2, Fabio Tranchitella ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On sab, 01 lug 2006, Neil Roeth wrote:
>
> Content-Description: message body text
> > strace output is attached.
>
> Hi Neil,
> could you please run again strace with the "-f" switch, in order to t
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 10:06 -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Neil Roeth wrote:
>
> > From the strace output I just sent, it appears that the child process is
> > failing to find the function epoll_create(), which a quick Google shows is a
> > function introduced in Linux kernel
13 matches
Mail list logo
