Bug#378715: libopentoken: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on gnat ( 3.16)

2006-08-03 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/28/2006 04:39 AM, Ludovic Brenta wrote: Felipe Augusto van de Wiel writes: [...] It is against debian policy to invent a new version number on behalf of upstream; it should really be 3.0b-3.1 for an NMU, or 3.0b-4 if you submit the patch to

Bug#378715: libopentoken: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on gnat ( 3.16)

2006-07-28 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel writes: Looking in debian/rules I found out that the major from the version field is used as soname, as I'm a little bit new with library RC bugfix, I just want to know if I did it right, before submit the patch. I did not touch debian/rules. I added the following

Bug#378715: libopentoken: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on gnat ( 3.16)

2006-07-27 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Felipe, Thanks for the contribution, but this is insufficient. You see, the new Ada compiler (GCC 4.1) changes the ABI, so it is necessary to change the soname of the shared library. I am currently in the process of migrating all Ada packages to the new compiler, but I am struggling. Would you

Bug#378715: libopentoken: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on gnat ( 3.16)

2006-07-27 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/27/2006 05:58 AM, Ludovic Brenta wrote: Felipe, Thanks for the contribution, but this is insufficient. You see, the new Ada compiler (GCC 4.1) changes the ABI, so it is necessary to change the soname of the shared library. I am currently