On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 11:25:00PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
None of the options is used. Thus according to FSF this is a free
license.
Good to know.
additional major point, namely the license fails to pass the dissident
test (see http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html). The
Stefano -
additional major point, namely the license fails to pass the dissident
test (see http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html). The reason is
that every modification to a document published under this license must
be owned by an identified author. This is the verbatim text
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:24:31PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
The name Open Publication License is right, the URL was wrong.
Could you please correct the URL then? I guess the following is the
correct one:
I have changed it. The ftp server will soon have the updated files.
Thanks.
Stefano -
Do you think it is possible to relicense the manual under a different
license? (The best possible is usually the same that applies to the
source code of the program itself). How many parts are taken from
Oualline's book? Is it possible to rewrite them? We are of course
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 11:25:00PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
* The debian-legal as determined it as non DFSG-free (see
http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#head-add2e754f3a906f07e4ff1c050a2548f04ef4cbe)
Debian people tend to spend more time on splitting hairs than others.
For what
Stefano -
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 09:52:14PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
The name Open Publication License is right, the URL was wrong.
Could you please correct the URL then? I guess the following is the
correct one:
http://opencontent.org/openpub/
I have changed it. The ftp
James Vega wrote:
In the manual-copyright help toic, the text states that the user manual
and reference manual are licensed under the Open Publication License[0]
(which is also referred to in the subsequent frombook topic). The
URL[1] listed under manual-copyright points to the Open Content
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 09:52:14PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
The name Open Publication License is right, the URL was wrong.
Could you please correct the URL then? I guess the following is the
correct one:
http://opencontent.org/openpub/
The book by Steve Oualline uses this license, I
Bram,
In the manual-copyright help toic, the text states that the user manual
and reference manual are licensed under the Open Publication License[0]
(which is also referred to in the subsequent frombook topic). The
URL[1] listed under manual-copyright points to the Open Content License
(which
9 matches
Mail list logo
