Le vendredi 1 septembre 2006 01:41, Jason Thomas a écrit :
> Because the people that wrote it knew of no other way. If you are
> skilled in bash scripting we would love your input. Patch or Advice
> are both welcome.
Yeah right, come to look at it, I can hardly imagine rewriting
update-grub.real
Because the people that wrote it knew of no other way. If you are
skilled in bash scripting we would love your input. Patch or Advice are
both welcome.
Thanks.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:41:45PM +0300, R??mi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Le jeudi 31 ao?t 2006 02:24, vous avez ?crit :
> > But /usr/sbin
Le jeudi 31 août 2006 02:24, vous avez écrit :
> But /usr/sbin/update-grub still has /bin/sh as its interpreter and
> executing this file with dash fails:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# /usr/sbin/update-grub
> [: 25: ==: unexpected operator
> exec: 25: -a: not found
Is there any serious reason for using
Package: grub
Version: 0.97-14
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.4
grub 0.97-14 had the following changelog enty:
* update-grub: Set interpreter to /bin/bash to cope with non-POSIX
extensions. (also mentioned in #361929)
But /usr/sbin/update-grub still has /bin/sh as its interpr
4 matches
Mail list logo
