Am Dienstag, 12. September 2006 03:57 schrieb Josip Rodin:
> Maybe remove libfam-dev? Our maildrop doesn't use it (but doesn't have an
> explicit Build-Conflicts set because nobody noticed it).
Yeah, it seems that you need to build-conflict against libfam-dev. With that
out of the way, I can con
Josip Rodin wrote:
> Well, duh. What's the problem? Any error messages? The package does
> actually seem to build for me and a dozen build daemons...
Linking maildirkwtest
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -I./.. -I.. -c maildirkw.c
Linking maildirkw
/usr/lib/libfam.a(fam.o): I
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 03:27:59AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > > cdbs runs dh_fixperms with the parameters you tell it. The
> > > > > problem is in your rules file.
> > > >
> > > > As you can see for yourself, maildrop rules file simply says:
> > > >
> > > > DEB_FIXPERMS_EXCLUDE := lock
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 03:52:13AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Well, duh. What's the problem? Any error messages? The package does
> > actually seem to build for me and a dozen build daemons...
>
> Linking maildirkwtest
> cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -I./.. -I.. -c
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:21:38AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > cdbs runs dh_fixperms with the parameters you tell it. The
> > > > problem is in your rules file.
> > >
> > > As you can see for yourself, maildrop rules file simply says:
> > >
> > > DEB_FIXPERMS_EXCLUD
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:21:38AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > cdbs runs dh_fixperms with the parameters you tell it. The problem
> > > is in your rules file.
> >
> > As you can see for yourself, maildrop rules file simply says:
> >
> > DEB_FIXPERMS_EXCLUDE := lockmail.maildrop maildrop
>
Josip Rodin wrote:
> > cdbs runs dh_fixperms with the parameters you tell it. The problem
> > is in your rules file.
>
> As you can see for yourself, maildrop rules file simply says:
>
> DEB_FIXPERMS_EXCLUDE := lockmail.maildrop maildrop
>
> How should this be reformatted to actually work properly
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:59:20AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > retitle 386952 cdbs debhelper rules runs dh_fixperms with -X for
> > > setuid/setgid binaries, wrongly thinking it is an exact match
>
> cdbs runs dh_fixperms with the parameters you tell it. The problem is
> in your rules f
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > retitle 386952 cdbs debhelper rules runs dh_fixperms with -X for
> > setuid/setgid binaries, wrongly thinking it is an exact match
cdbs runs dh_fixperms with the parameters you tell it. The problem is
in your rules file.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
9 matches
Mail list logo
