Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?

2006-10-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
reassign 387498 linux-2.6,libc6 On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 08:02:58AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > I am able to reproduce this bug, but on mipsel only. I am using a 2.6.17 > 64-bit kernel. I have made some more tests, I am actually able to reproduce it on both mips and mipsel, but only on 2.6 ker

Processed: Re: Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?

2006-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 387498 linux-2.6,libc6 Bug#387498: mipsel: system() hangs when compiled with -pg (gprof profiling) Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `linux-2.6,libc6'. > On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 08:02:58AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Unknown command or m

Processed: Re: Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?

2006-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 387498 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3 Bug#387498: mipsel: system() hangs when compiled with -pg (gprof profiling) Bug marked as found in version 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3. > close 2.3.999.2-11 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > thanks Stopping pr

Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?

2006-10-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
found 387498 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3 close 2.3.999.2-11 thanks I am able to reproduce this bug, but on mipsel only. I am using a 2.6.17 64-bit kernel. First I have found the bug is also present in the glibc from sarge, but fixed in the glibc from experimental. Then I have done an strace: execve("./

Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?

2006-10-07 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Don't know if this helps, but gcl 2.6.7-21 failed on mips(el) autobuilders for the same reason. Take care, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:19:11AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > >Greetings, and thanks for looking into this! It is still there on

Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?

2006-10-07 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:19:11AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: >Greetings, and thanks for looking into this! It is still there on the >sid dchroot on vaughan: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat t.c >int >main(int argc,char * argv[]) {return system(argv[1]);} >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cc -g t.c -o t >[EMAIL P

Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?

2006-10-02 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks for looking into this! It is still there on the sid dchroot on vaughan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat t.c int main(int argc,char * argv[]) {return system(argv[1]);} [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cc -g t.c -o t [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./t "echo g" g [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cc -g -pg t.c -o t [

Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?

2006-09-30 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Steve McIntyre wrote: > I've tried to look into this on my mips machine, but all seems to work > as expected: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ zless /usr/share/doc/libc6/changelog.Debian.gz > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat >t.c > int > main(int argc,char * argv[]) {return system(argv[1]);} > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?

2006-09-30 Thread Steve McIntyre
I've tried to look into this on my mips machine, but all seems to work as expected: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ zless /usr/share/doc/libc6/changelog.Debian.gz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat >t.c int main(int argc,char * argv[]) {return system(argv[1]);} [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cc -g t.c -o t [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$