Hi Ralf, hi Norbert,
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> A general point: Recently I was thinking whether it would make sense to
>>> change the behaviour of 'format providing packages' such as tetex-
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> tetex-base would occur. If tetex-bin's postinst would call
>> update-format, the problematic lines would not be present in fmtutil.cnf
>> due to the present .dpkg-new file.
>
> I agree, we should get a tetex-bin
On Fre, 29 Sep 2006, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> A general point: Recently I was thinking whether it would make sense to
> change the behaviour of 'format providing packages' such as tetex-base
> or jadetex: Right now they regerenate all formats, even though this is
> not necessary. Why not have them reg
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed in principle (see below). However, I think it is also important
> that every package that calls fmtutil/updmap/... has to call the
> apropriate update-* scripts before, which tetex-bin does not at the moment.
>
> Just imagine that instead of tetex-b
Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I don't understand. Shouldn't tetex-bin call the update-* scripts before
>> generating formats/map files/...
>>
>> [Looking into common.functions.in]
>>
>> It seems it doesn't. IMO that's the bigger problem.
>
> I think every pack
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> The assumption above is wrong, or at least short-sighted. updmap-sys
>> and fmtutil-sys can only be called when tetex-bin is there. However, we
>> *must* call the update script under all circumstances. Otherwise
>> tetex-bin wil
Frank Küster wrote:
> The assumption above is wrong, or at least short-sighted. updmap-sys
> and fmtutil-sys can only be called when tetex-bin is there. However, we
> *must* call the update script under all circumstances. Otherwise
> tetex-bin will be without language information etc. I wonder
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-22
Severity: serious
Tags: pending
>From postinst.in:
# if tetex-base is upgraded while tetex-bin is already installed, we must
# call mktexlr, and regenerate the formats and font maps.
clean_texenvironment
TEXINIT_P=""
KPSEWHICH=""
test -x `which
8 matches
Mail list logo