Bug#392649: ircd-hybrid: FTBFS on alpha: epoll_* syscall definitions changed since last build

2006-10-12 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
Hi alpha porters, As I wrote in the bug report, I am turning around to find a fix. This bug did not appear in the previous build from the same release. It also does not appear on other architectures, because ircd-hybrid only uses epoll on alpha as rtsigio does not work there. Any help would be

Bug#392649: ircd-hybrid: FTBFS on alpha: epoll_* syscall definitions changed since last build

2006-10-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:37:59PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: As I wrote in the bug report, I am turning around to find a fix. FWIW, this doesn't translate well into idiomatic English. :) I think you mean that you're desperate to find a fix? This bug did not appear in the previous build

Bug#392649: ircd-hybrid: FTBFS on alpha: epoll_* syscall definitions changed since last build

2006-10-12 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:37:59PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: gcc -I../include -I/usr/include/pcre -Wall -O2 -g -c s_bsd_epoll.c s_bsd_epoll.c:87: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'epoll_create' s_bsd_epoll.c:87: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...'

Bug#392649: ircd-hybrid: FTBFS on alpha: epoll_* syscall definitions changed since last build

2006-10-12 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 02:55:40PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: From the looks of it, it seems like you should be able to just delete all the preprocessor stuff after the #includes in s_bsd_epoll.c and get away with it. We know that etch will release with a glibc that contains a valid epoll

Bug#392649: ircd-hybrid: FTBFS on alpha: epoll_* syscall definitions changed since last build

2006-10-12 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 04:09:53PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:37:59PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: As I wrote in the bug report, I am turning around to find a fix. FWIW, this doesn't translate well into idiomatic English. :) I think you mean that you're