Bug#393831: more info

2007-06-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-20 18:46]: > > package from ia64 for now... > I was hoping that the underlying bug in ld would get fixed and that this > would start working again, as it has in the past. Otherwise, yes, perhaps > it just needs to be removed from ia64. I'm not su

Bug#393831: more info

2007-06-20 Thread Wesley J. Landaker
On Wednesday 20 June 2007 00:22:34 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 19/10/06 at 09:40 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-18 20:17]: > > > Hmmm... I'll see if upstream can help with this, but it can almost > > > guarantee it won't be in time for etch. (It'

Bug#393831: more info

2007-06-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 19/10/06 at 09:40 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-18 20:17]: > > Hmmm... I'll see if upstream can help with this, but it can almost > > guarantee > > it won't be in time for etch. (It's doubtful upstream has an IA64 to test > > on). > > In t

Bug#393831: more info

2006-10-19 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-18 20:17]: > Hmmm... I'll see if upstream can help with this, but it can almost guarantee > it won't be in time for etch. (It's doubtful upstream has an IA64 to test > on). In this case I suggest you get the ia64 binary removed and downgrade this

Bug#393831: more info

2006-10-18 Thread Wesley J. Landaker
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 03:39, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > ghdl_0.24+gcc4.1.1-1 can be compiled with a current version of sid. > > So it seems pretty clear this bug is due to a change from 0.24 to > 0.25. Hmmm... I'll see if upstream can help with this, but it can almost guarantee it won't be

Processed: Re: Bug#393831: more info

2006-10-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package ghdl Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ghdl > forwarded 393831 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#393831: FTBFS on ia64: fails with ld assertion failure Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > tag 393831 upstream help Bug#39383

Bug#393831: more info

2006-10-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
ghdl_0.24+gcc4.1.1-1 can be compiled with a current version of sid. So it seems pretty clear this bug is due to a change from 0.24 to 0.25. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE