On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 06:04:40PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Alexandre Fayolle writes:
> > In my opinion, shipping etch with python2.5 (even as non default) and no
> > extension module compiled for python2.5 is a bit strange.
>
> you can explicitely add support for 2.5 in the package, i.e.
>
Alexandre Fayolle writes:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 10:58:02AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
> > > I'm trying to build and upload a new release of python-psyco, and the
> > > built package is wrong because `pyversions -r debian/con
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
> > Concerning python2.5, it's not enabled yet because it's not expected to
> > be the default version in etch, but I suppose it could be now that it
> > is officially released and in sync in etch.
> In my opinion, shipping etch with python2.5 (even
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 10:58:02AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2006, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
> > I'm trying to build and upload a new release of python-psyco, and the
> > built package is wrong because `pyversions -r debian/control` returns
> > python2.4 even thoug
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
> I'm trying to build and upload a new release of python-psyco, and the
> built package is wrong because `pyversions -r debian/control` returns
> python2.4 even though debian/control says that XS-Python-Version is
> >=2.2, << 2.6.
>
> I
I think this is the same problem as mentioned in the bug.
I'm trying to build and upload a new release of python-psyco, and the
built package is wrong because `pyversions -r debian/control` returns
python2.4 even though debian/control says that XS-Python-Version is
>=2.2, << 2.6.
I have python
6 matches
Mail list logo