On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 04:51:45PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Thomas Dickey:
>
> > It's a #define. But the change to use the home directory is in the
> > wrong place. I'd point out that it doesn't solve the problem, and
> > that the program is still subject to the same issue as reported, [
* Thomas Dickey:
> It's a #define. But the change to use the home directory is in the
> wrong place. I'd point out that it doesn't solve the problem, and
> that the program is still subject to the same issue as reported, [...]
This is not correct. Gracious write operations to the home director
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 07:00:14AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > > There's no possibility of including that patch upstream.
> >
> > So what? If upstream does not want to accept a patch that fixes a
>
> so what? Read the patch. You certainly didn't, or if you _did_ you
> understand nothing of
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 02:15:42PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Thomas Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061130 14:12]:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > > I didn't know PERSONAL_MAILCAP was run-time configurable (it looks
> > > a #define to me). If apt-get source w
* Thomas Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061130 14:12]:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > I didn't know PERSONAL_MAILCAP was run-time configurable (it looks
> > a #define to me). If apt-get source wasn't segfaulting at the moment I'd
>
> It's a #define. But the chang
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> I didn't know PERSONAL_MAILCAP was run-time configurable (it looks
> a #define to me). If apt-get source wasn't segfaulting at the moment I'd
It's a #define. But the change to use the home directory is in the
wrong place. I'd point
6 matches
Mail list logo
