* Stefan Fritsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061202 04:55]:
> LHA seems to be affected by
> CVE-2006-4335
> CVE-2006-4337
> CVE-2006-4338
All these bugs seem to be in gzip, not in lha?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:48, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> If GNU gzip can handle LHA archives I'm wondering if the non-free
> lha is really worth keeping?
I don't think gzip can handle LHA archives. It just supports one
obscure format that uses LHA's algorithm.
BTW, in combination with amav
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 01:54:57PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Package: lha
> Version: 1.14i-10
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
>
> LHA seems to be affected by
> CVE-2006-4335
> CVE-2006-4337
> CVE-2006-4338
If GNU gzip can handle LHA archives I'm won
Package: lha
Version: 1.14i-10
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
LHA seems to be affected by
CVE-2006-4335
CVE-2006-4337
CVE-2006-4338
See
http://secunia.com/advisories/23153/
for details
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
4 matches
Mail list logo