On Wednesday 06 December 2006 15:21, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Is there
> a soname changed involded? aka will apps build against 0.10
> still run when exiv2 0.12 is installed without a rebuild?
I've just had a look and there is an soname change and thus a library
transition involved..
Mark
On 2006-12-06 10:21:38 -0500 Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ufraw is the only package, which I don't maintain which also has a
dependancy on exiv2 and they are Cc:ed on this email.
Thanks for CC:ing me.
I can reupload ufraw if necessary. But as long as there are no API
changes in e
debian-release,
We have a couple of nasty (RC) bugs against digikam (crashes startup)
caused if the user has corrupted meta-data within their JPEG images.
The crash is caused by poor handling of exiv2 libraries, which has been
fixed in subsequent revisions of exiv2. unstable has 0.10, upstream ha
Mark,
I have an almost ready 0.12 packaged. 0.11 was skipped due to
the misunderstandings around sonames and C++ ABI upgrades. The
release managers allow upload of 0.12, I can do it today at
midnight UTC. If you have changes other than the bugs, please
send them to me.
Peter
--
.+'''+.
4 matches
Mail list logo
