tags 403117 etch-ignore
thanks
As 2.5-2 fixes the problems with the incomplete debian/copyright and should
enter testing shortly, I'm tagging this bug etch-ignore for the remaining
question of whether the required disclaimer is intended to contradict the
GPL.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
Hi!
This was apparently fixed in the 2.5-2 upload:
* add xmms-mp4 desription read not like nonsense (Closes: #399457)
* Compile without Digital Radio Mondiale support, as it breaks base
functionality
* Update debian/copyright (See: #403117)
Matthew, so you agree that this bug can b
You might want to read this regarding the license issue:
http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2006/12/20/lets-hear-the-communitys-voice-the-faad-2-5-licensing-issue
I also tried to contact ahead a few times in the past with absolutely no
answer. As you might've noticed I'm maintaining
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:47:15PM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> currently debian/copyright mentions that the package is licensed under
> plain GPL. This is apparently wrong as for example src/cfft.h state
> (other files too):
> [... GPL boilerplate ...]
> ** Software using this code must display
Package: faad2
Version: 2.5-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
currently debian/copyright mentions that the package is licensed under
plain GPL. This is apparently wrong as for example src/cfft.h state
(other files too):
[... GPL boilerplate ...]
** Software using this code must display the following message v
5 matches
Mail list logo