Bug#403380: Bug#403879: ffscan filename conflict

2006-12-25 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Sorry for late reply, and thank you for your advices and works. > > Well, unless it looks like forutil should be removed, > > I think it has the "older" rights. > I'd prefer not to have them conflict, since FORTRAN use is still common > in gromacs's field -- co-installability would be a benefit.

Bug#403380: Bug#403879: ffscan filename conflict

2006-12-23 Thread Nicholas Breen
> > How would you like to handle this bug? I'm slightly reluctant to rename > > the binary in gromacs for fear of breaking user scripts, but also > > recognize that forutil has been using the name for many more years. > > It's unclear to me which package change would be less disruptive. > > Well,