Sorry for late reply, and thank you for your advices and works.
> > Well, unless it looks like forutil should be removed,
> > I think it has the "older" rights.
> I'd prefer not to have them conflict, since FORTRAN use is still common
> in gromacs's field -- co-installability would be a benefit.
> > How would you like to handle this bug? I'm slightly reluctant to rename
> > the binary in gromacs for fear of breaking user scripts, but also
> > recognize that forutil has been using the name for many more years.
> > It's unclear to me which package change would be less disruptive.
>
> Well,
2 matches
Mail list logo