owner 404279 !
severity 404279 important
thanks
The license issue is now categorised in a clone of #403117; I have a new
package (to be uploaded) that provides slightly more sane headers; and
we are no longer about to release, so I am more confident that the
necessary issues will be resolved and t
tag 414725 confirmed
block 414725 by 404279
thanks
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Do you think it is a good idea to dynamically link vlc against Debian's
> libfaad0? As long as there are those license issues with faad2 [0] there
> is a chance that those packages -- faad2 AND vlc -
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 05:33:40PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Matthew W. S. Bell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061222 19:55]:
> > This package is currently unsuitable for inclusion in a release or the
> > testing distribution due to elsewhere mentioned license issues, and
> > unresolved API stability a
* Matthew W. S. Bell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061222 19:55]:
> This package is currently unsuitable for inclusion in a release or the
> testing distribution due to elsewhere mentioned license issues, and
> unresolved API stability and definition issues.
As far as I can see we could still include it on
Package: faad2
Severity: serious
This package is currently unsuitable for inclusion in a release or the
testing distribution due to elsewhere mentioned license issues, and
unresolved API stability and definition issues.
Would the FTP masters or release manages have all packages in this
source pac
5 matches
Mail list logo
