Bug#405639: Bug#406058: failed to load module kbd

2007-01-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jan 8, 2007 at 13:21:54 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: So what should be done with this bug? Should it be merged with bug #405639? Do you think it needs to be treated as RC independently of bug #405639? (FWIW, I don't; smooth upgrades from unofficial backports are absolutely not RC in

Bug#405639: Bug#406058: failed to load module kbd

2007-01-08 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:27:22PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Jan 8, 2007 at 13:21:54 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: So what should be done with this bug? Should it be merged with bug #405639? Do you think it needs to be treated as RC independently of bug #405639? (FWIW, I