Processed: Re: Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 409691 atlas3-base Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction Bug reassigned from package `octave2.9-forge' to `atlas3-base'. > severity 409691 serious Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/ru

Bug#409691: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
severity 409691 normal thanks * Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 22:03]: > May I lower the severity of this bug report to normal? The package > has already been correctly auto-built on amd64 [1]. It seems that > there is a problem in Martin's system (at least, I hope so!). Yes

Processed: Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 409691 normal Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#409691: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 21:40]: > * Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 21:26]: > > > It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch). > > > Kurt (Q_), can you verify this or do only I see this? > > It works for me. Are you trying this with a d

Bug#409691: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 21:26]: > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 08:20:22PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > Package: octave2.9-forge > > Version: 2006.07.09+dfsg1-7 > > Severity: serious > > > > It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch). > > Kurt (Q_), ca

Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 09:40:59PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 21:26]: > > > It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch). > > > Kurt (Q_), can you verify this or do only I see this? > > It works for me. Are you trying this wi

Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 21:26]: > > It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch). > > Kurt (Q_), can you verify this or do only I see this? > It works for me. Are you trying this with a different version of gcc or > something? No, I verified the problem

Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 08:20:22PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Package: octave2.9-forge > Version: 2006.07.09+dfsg1-7 > Severity: serious > > It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch). > Kurt (Q_), can you verify this or do only I see this? It works for me. Are you t

Bug#409691: FTBFS on amd64: admin/run_forge: line 58: 1020 Illegal instruction

2007-02-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: octave2.9-forge Version: 2006.07.09+dfsg1-7 Severity: serious It seems this package no longer builds on AMD64 (in sid and etch). Kurt (Q_), can you verify this or do only I see this? > Automatic build of octave2.9-forge_2006.07.09+dfsg1-7 on em64t by > sbuild/amd64 0.52 ... > Arithmet