On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 08:19:44AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:06:23PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > It's acceptable to me; the final d-i images haven't been spun yet for etch,
> > and anyway a one-line change for a shlibs fix isn't exactly a big delta so I
> > don't
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 02:08:01PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> In this case it is not a problem because, AFAICT, none of the udebs built
> with e2fsprogs are included in any D-I initrd.
> I will reply separately to d-release with my reasons why I feel it would
> be a bad idea if it *had* been inclu
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:06:23PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It's acceptable to me; the final d-i images haven't been spun yet for etch,
> and anyway a one-line change for a shlibs fix isn't exactly a big delta so I
> don't see a reason to respin even if we did have version skew. (I.e., the
>
On Sunday 04 March 2007 06:06, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It's acceptable to me; the final d-i images haven't been spun yet for
> etch, and anyway a one-line change for a shlibs fix isn't exactly a big
> delta so I don't see a reason to respin even if we did have version
> skew. (I.e., the source req
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:50:54PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:57:40PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > I talked to the release team -- they'd approve a freeze exception
> > for fixing the shlibs entry.
> To the Debian-Release team,
> Could you please con
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:57:40PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>
> I talked to the release team -- they'd approve a freeze exception
> for fixing the shlibs entry.
To the Debian-Release team,
Could you please confirm that you'd approve a freeze exception
to fix the shlibs entry f
6 matches
Mail list logo
