severity 416096 important
thanks
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 11:30:23PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> I disagree about the severity. The code history of graphicksmagick/
> imagemagick makes it fairly obvious that they are both unsuitable
> for processing images from untrusted sources. An afternoo
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 06:20:43PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> Oops. Next try.
Ok.
segv2.viff still gives heap corruption with that patch applied
(segv.viff is fixed). Might have something to do with realloc()ing to
0 bytes in AllocateImageColormap with colors=0, but obviously there's
some corr
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 07:03:35PM +0300, Sami Liedes wrote:
> Hmm, sorry, but I don't see any patch attached?
Oops. Next try.
Regards,
Daniel.
--- a/coders/viff.c Wed Mar 21 21:20:05 2007 +0100
+++ b/coders/viff.c Wed Mar 21 23:49:56 2007 +0200
@@ -332,6 +332,8 @@ static Image *ReadVIF
3 matches
Mail list logo