Processed: Re: Bug#418473 closed by Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: /usr/share/doc/cdrecord empty)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 418473 Bug#418473: /usr/share/doc/cdrecord empty Bug reopened, originator not changed. retitle 418473 cdrecord: improper migration of directory to a symlink Bug#418473: /usr/share/doc/cdrecord empty Changed Bug title to cdrecord: improper

Bug#418473: closed by Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: /usr/share/doc/cdrecord empty)

reopen 418473 retitle 418473 cdrecord: improper migration of directory to a symlink tags 418473 etch thanks On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:59:52PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: Since cdrecord depends on wodim, from the same source package, it can simply ship a symlink from /usr/share/doc/cdrecord

Bug#418473: closed by Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: /usr/share/doc/cdrecord empty)

[Resending with Steve in the CC list.] Since cdrecord depends on wodim, from the same source package, it can simply ship a symlink from /usr/share/doc/cdrecord to wodim. That's precisely what it does. H. Looking at the contents of a freshly-downloaded cdrecord deb, it does appear to

Bug#418473: closed by Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: /usr/share/doc/cdrecord empty)

Since cdrecord depends on wodim, from the same source package, it can simply ship a symlink from /usr/share/doc/cdrecord to wodim. That's precisely what it does. H. Looking at the contents of a freshly-downloaded cdrecord deb, it does appear to ship a symlink. However, on my system, I