Bug#444704: ttyrec is not redundant

2007-11-29 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
reassign 444704 wnpp severity 444704 normal retitle 444704 O: ttyrec -- A tty recorder thanks Hi, There still seems to be some interest in keeping ttyrec in Debian. But since the maintainer never replied on this thread, I'm now orphaning it. Feel free to adopt it. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PR

Processed: Re: Bug#444704: ttyrec is not redundant

2007-11-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 444704 wnpp Bug#444704: ttyrec: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `ttyrec' to `wnpp'. > severity 444704 normal Bug#444704: ttyrec: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > retitle 444

Bug#444704: ttyrec is not redundant

2007-10-15 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:11:07PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 12/10/07 at 15:06 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > I would say that ttyrec is worth keeping. > > Hi Adam, (I'm away for the weekend, sorry for the delay...) > Would you be interested in maintaining ttyrec in Debian? Perhaps; i

Bug#444704: ttyrec is not redundant

2007-10-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 12/10/07 at 15:06 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > I would say that ttyrec is worth keeping. Hi Adam, Would you be interested in maintaining ttyrec in Debian? Your rationale for keeping it seems good, thanks for providing that info. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Bug#444704: ttyrec is not redundant

2007-10-12 Thread Adam Borowski
I would say that ttyrec is worth keeping. First, the RC bug(s) are trivially fixable, all it takes is changing a simple flag, a fix is in the BTS for five freaking years. Ttyrec is used quite a bit, especially among NetHack and MUD players, so at very least something which reads ttyrec's format s