severity 446665 normal
reassign 446665 ftp.debian.org
retitle 446665 RM: mercury -- RoQA; RC buggy
thanks
On 14/10/07 at 20:32 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* 4 RC bugs opened for a long time
* not suitable for a stable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 446665 normal
Bug#446665: mercury: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 446665 ftp.debian.org
Bug#446665: mercury: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `mercury
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 06:43:27PM +1100, Peter Hawkins wrote:
Hi...
On Feb 20, 2008 9:50 AM, Paul Bone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mercury also supports 'grades', this makes it different to other
compliers and more interesting to package. Each grade represents a
complier backend and some
Hi folks,
Sorry for all of the CCs but all of you have expressed interest in
fixing/adopting this package (with the exception of QA).
Do any of you still have an interest and/or a plan to fix this
package? According to the Mecury website, it is supposed to build with
gcc-4.1 which would
I filed the initial ITA, but have then been unable to make much progress because of other commitments (including being
overseas for a while).
Unfortunately, although I'm back now, unforeseen personal circumstances mean I won't be able to do anything in the
immediate future (next 2-3 weeks at
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 03:27:37PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
Hi folks,
Sorry for all of the CCs but all of you have expressed interest in
fixing/adopting this package (with the exception of QA).
Do any of you still have an interest and/or a plan to fix this
package? According to
Paul Bone wrote:
Hi Barry.
I'm interested in re-packaging this, however it's going to be one of
those things that gets a small amount of attention here and there. I'm
one of the Mercury developers, so I use and develop on Mercury
day-to-day.
This will mean that there may be 6-12
Hi...
On Feb 20, 2008 9:50 AM, Paul Bone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mercury also supports 'grades', this makes it different to other
compliers and more interesting to package. Each grade represents a
complier backend and some options. There are two C backends, a Java
backend, and Erlang
On 30/11/07 at 17:22 +1300, Roy Ward wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Have you made some progress on this package?
Some, but not enough to submit a package.
One bit of news is that gcc-3.3 is going to be the required compiler. I've
looking at building Mercury 0.13.1 with several versions of
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I don't know anything about mercury, but maybe it would be a better plan
to package rotds, and find and fix bugs in them, instead of trying to
get an old version in debian, and then switching to a brand new release
just before lenny.
Note that you could also decide to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
notfixed 446665 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5
Bug#446665: mercury: should this package be removed?
Bug no longer marked as fixed in version 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5.
found 446665 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5
Bug#446665: mercury: should this package be removed?
Bug
notfixed 446665 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5
found 446665 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5
thanks
On 15/10/07 at 00:38 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi Roy,
On 15/10/07 at 11:03 +1300, Roy Ward wrote:
* New upstream release available for a long time now
I'm working on packaging that - it's still going
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Have you made some progress on this package?
Some, but not enough to submit a package.
One bit of news is that gcc-3.3 is going to be the required compiler. I've looking at building Mercury 0.13.1 with
several versions of gcc on x86 and amd64, and while projects are fine
Package: mercury
Version: 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* 4 RC bugs opened for a long time
* not suitable for a stable release according to #281369
* Low
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: mercury
Version: 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* 4 RC bugs opened for a long time
Of the bugs:
* #281369: Dummy RC bug
Hi Roy,
On 15/10/07 at 11:03 +1300, Roy Ward wrote:
* New upstream release available for a long time now
I'm working on packaging that - it's still going to take some time (in the
order of weeks).
If you think that it should be orphaned instead of being removed from
Debian, please
16 matches
Mail list logo
