Bug#446726: file conflicts between packages

2007-10-15 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Nicholas Breen wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 09:03:41PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: >>> As Your package is the older package, and genbox is probably not one of >>> the very often used tools, I'll rename it in Debian. >> It sounds like that will be the least disruptive ove

Bug#446726: file conflicts between packages

2007-10-15 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Nicholas Breen wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 09:03:41PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: >> As Your package is the older package, and genbox is probably not one of >> the very often used tools, I'll rename it in Debian. > > It sounds like that will be the least disruptive overall. Thanks very > muc

Bug#446726: file conflicts between packages

2007-10-15 Thread Nicholas Breen
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 09:03:41PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > As Your package is the older package, and genbox is probably not one of > the very often used tools, I'll rename it in Debian. It sounds like that will be the least disruptive overall. Thanks very much. I'll be making a new upload

Bug#446726: file conflicts between packages

2007-10-15 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
> However, radiance also ships a large number of files in /usr/bin, which > I assume are scriptable too? Is renaming the command likely to cause > equivalent problems for your users? Exactly. About 75% of the programs were made to be run from scripts and/or other programs to prepare materials an

Bug#446726: file conflicts between packages

2007-10-15 Thread Nicholas Breen
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:17:52PM +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote: > As a GROMACS user, I'd prefer to keep the name "genbox" since it's one > of the tools in the GROMACS suite that is used quite often and a lot of > my scripts would need an update to work on a name change. I think there > are more peopl

Bug#446726: file conflicts between packages

2007-10-15 Thread Manuel Prinz
Hi Bernd! Am Montag, den 15.10.2007, 13:23 +0200 schrieb Bernd Zeimetz: > I can also rename genbox to radgenbox. > I guess your package attracts more people, so it should probably keep > the binaries name. On the other side - if genbox is only rarely used in > gromacs, the better thing would be to

Bug#446726: file conflicts between packages

2007-10-15 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi, > I suggest: > rename genbox to g_genbox, add a comment to gromacs' README.Debian, > > what's your opinion? Ignore my last mail please. I can also rename genbox to radgenbox. I guess your package attracts more people, so it should probably keep the binaries name. On the other side - if genb

Bug#446726: file conflicts between packages

2007-10-15 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi, >> both gromacs and radiance ship `/usr/bin/genbox' but do neither conflict nor >> add a diversion, thus fail to be installed in the same environment: >> >> > Unpacking gromacs (from .../gromacs_3.3.1-7_amd64.deb) ... >> > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gromacs_3.3.1-7_amd64.

Bug#446726: file conflicts between packages

2007-10-15 Thread LI Daobing
On 10/15/07, Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: gromacs, radiance > Severity: serious > Justification: policy violation > > hi, > > both gromacs and radiance ship `/usr/bin/genbox' but do neither conflict nor > add a diversion, thus fail to be installed in the same environmen

Bug#446726: file conflicts between packages

2007-10-15 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: gromacs, radiance Severity: serious Justification: policy violation hi, both gromacs and radiance ship `/usr/bin/genbox' but do neither conflict nor add a diversion, thus fail to be installed in the same environment: > Unpacking gromacs (from .../gromacs_3.3.1-7_amd64.deb) ... > dpkg: