Florian Lohoff wrote:
> is "grave" really the right priority for this bug?
Yes, it is.
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
> grave
> makes the package in question unusable or mostly so, or causes data
> loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to the accounts of
> users who
Hi,
is "grave" really the right priority for this bug? I mean if you fill
up your disk you get what you deserve. I dont think somebody files
a grave bug against a package because the application dies when there is
no memory left.
I think "normal" would fit better - and Mako please NMU ...
This i
Package: gqview
Version: 2.0.4-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
configuration is not saved atomically. So on errors
like out of space a 0 sized file overwrites a good
configuration.
Instead gqview should write configuration to a temp
file and when everything went OK replace the new
configuration fil
3 matches
Mail list logo
