Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 456679 normal
Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> reassign 456679 wnpp
Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned?
Bug reassigned from package `pam
severity 456679 normal
reassign 456679 wnpp
retitle 456679 O: pam-pgsql -- PAM module to authenticate using a PostgreSQL
database
thanks
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:50:54PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that
> should maybe be orp
Hello *,
Am 2007-12-25 11:40:09, schrieb Philipp Kern:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:50:54PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> > If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being
> > orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so.
>
> Just for the record: I do not agree with the
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:50:54PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being
> orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so.
Just for the record: I do not agree with the removal of this package.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.
Package: pam-pgsql
Version: 0.5.2-9.3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-orphan
Hi,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that
should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because:
* maintainer seems not active
* no upload maintainer since lo
5 matches
Mail list logo