Processed: Re: Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned?

2008-01-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456679 normal Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456679 wnpp Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `pam

Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned?

2008-01-29 Thread Philipp Kern
severity 456679 normal reassign 456679 wnpp retitle 456679 O: pam-pgsql -- PAM module to authenticate using a PostgreSQL database thanks On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:50:54PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that > should maybe be orp

Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned?

2008-01-08 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello *, Am 2007-12-25 11:40:09, schrieb Philipp Kern: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:50:54PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > > If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being > > orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so. > > Just for the record: I do not agree with the

Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned?

2007-12-25 Thread Philipp Kern
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:50:54PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being > orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so. Just for the record: I do not agree with the removal of this package. Kind regards, Philipp Kern signature.

Bug#456679: pam-pgsql: should this package be orphaned?

2007-12-17 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
Package: pam-pgsql Version: 0.5.2-9.3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * maintainer seems not active * no upload maintainer since lo