On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:34:44 +0100
Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 21:36:13 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> > > Cool. The package is here:
> > >
> > > http://people.debian.org/~dilinger/security/kazehakase/etch/
> > >
> > > I will give it a bit more testing late
On Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 21:36:13 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > Cool. The package is here:
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~dilinger/security/kazehakase/etch/
> >
> > I will give it a bit more testing later on tonight.
Thanks. I'll upload this tomorrow. I assume this will
be handled in
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:31:05 -0400
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:52:08 +0100
> Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 15:46:02 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> >
> > > I'd rather see kaz linked against the system's pcre;
> > > it's m
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:52:08 +0100
Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 15:46:02 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> > I'd rather see kaz linked against the system's pcre;
> > it's much easier to deal w/. Does the security team agree?
>
> Definitely!
>
> Steve
Cool.
On Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 15:46:02 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> I'd rather see kaz linked against the system's pcre;
> it's much easier to deal w/. Does the security team agree?
Definitely!
Steve
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Hi,
Here's a patch that forces the kazehakase in Etch to build against the system's
libpcre rather than the bundled pcre. I'd rather see kaz linked against
the system's pcre; it's much easier to deal w/. Does the security team
agree?
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 6c9c76c
6 matches
Mail list logo
