Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have the strace, please? It doesn't really make sense talking about an
> strace but then not attaching it, especially as I said that it works on
> my both machines now...
Wanted to take a look at it before flooding you with a big chunk of
possibly usele
Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In the meantime, your comment about the prerm makes it sound like the
>> package may not have been unregistered by the prerm, right ? unopkg
>
> Or not unregistered correctly, yes.
Ok, unopkg list --shared shows the extension as installed. I guess
this
Hi,
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> In the meantime, your comment about the prerm makes it sound like the
> package may not have been unregistered by the prerm, right ? unopkg
Or not unregistered correctly, yes.
> list lists no installed extensions, but maybe that needs some options
> to be really meanin
Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> If you know what causes it please help, otherwise please shut up with
> useless comments like this - thanks.
I don't know what's causing that, I did not have enough time to spend
on that issue this morning when I sent the followup.
I straced -f th
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> strace on the postinst script reveals that unopkg does most (if not all)
> of its job but still fails (I can see it opening various XML and other OOo
> files).
Have the strace, please? It doesn't really make sense talking about an
strace but then not attaching it, especially
Hi,
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > Of course, the "openoffice.org" dummy package depends on it because
> > writer2latex is shipped since 2.0.4 within OOo and people might wonder
> > where the functionality is now...
>
> OK, and what about fixing that [EMAIL PROTECTED] bug ? I can reproduce it at
> wil
Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Of course, the "openoffice.org" dummy package depends on it because
> writer2latex is shipped since 2.0.4 within OOo and people might wonder
> where the functionality is now...
OK, and what about fixing that [EMAIL PROTECTED] bug ? I can reproduce
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> I'd happily remove writer2latex which I do not need, if only it wasn't a
> Depends. Please demote it to a Recommends.
It is.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show openoffice.org-writer | grep writer2latex
Recommends: java-gcj-compat | icedtea-java7-jre | sun-java5-jre |
sun-j
Package: openoffice.org-writer2latex
Version: 0.5-5
Followup-For: Bug #468202
Hi,
Here the postinst barfs, the purge barfs too, I have no lockfile around
(contrary to what unopkg claims during the purge), purging and reinstalling
does not work.
strace on the postinst script reveals that unopkg d
9 matches
Mail list logo
