Bug#475625: dkimproxy is missing a start-dependency on postfix

2008-04-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
Michael Neuffer wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > thank you for reactng so fast > > Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Postfix and dkimproxy are 2 SMTP servers. I really don't think that one >> needs the other to be able to start. I don't understand at all why you >> are saying that postfix needs to be started first

Bug#475625: dkimproxy is missing a start-dependency on postfix

2008-04-12 Thread Michael Neuffer
Hi Thomas, thank you for reactng so fast Thomas Goirand wrote: Postfix and dkimproxy are 2 SMTP servers. I really don't think that one needs the other to be able to start. I don't understand at all why you are saying that postfix needs to be started first. Can you make it more clear? Sure, wh

Bug#475625: dkimproxy is missing a start-dependency on postfix

2008-04-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
Michael Neuffer wrote: > Package: dkimproxy > Version: 1.0.1-3 > Severity: critical > > dkimproxy must be started after postfix, otherwise it will > keep postfix from opening ports that it needs to communicate > with dkimproxy and thus from starting. Postfix and dkimproxy are 2 SMTP servers. I r

Bug#475625: dkimproxy is missing a start-dependency on postfix

2008-04-11 Thread Michael Neuffer
Package: dkimproxy Version: 1.0.1-3 Severity: critical dkimproxy must be started after postfix, otherwise it will keep postfix from opening ports that it needs to communicate with dkimproxy and thus from starting. ## For injecting mail back into postfix from the filter 127.0.0.1:10026 inet n -