On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:37:58 +0200 Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 09:32:13AM +, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> > Thus I think llvm-examples should only recommend llvm-dev without
> > any version (or does llvm break it's API with every release?).
>
> It does. Or at least often.
Uhm,
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 09:32:13AM +, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while looking at our RC bugs, I discovered this one and thought I could
> fix it by loosing the Dependency on llvm-dev to >= ${source:Version},
> but after looking at the package, I wondered if the Dependency is
> needed at al
Hi,
while looking at our RC bugs, I discovered this one and thought I could
fix it by loosing the Dependency on llvm-dev to >= ${source:Version},
but after looking at the package, I wondered if the Dependency is
needed at all.
The package contains only example sourcecode, which I would understand
3 matches
Mail list logo