Bug#500781: ubuntu/debian repos

2008-10-04 Thread Vincent Danjean
Martin Geisler wrote: Ken Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've been meaning to ask about why the Ubuntu hardy repo was so out of date. It currently has v0.9.5. I googled Vincent and found this page: http://www-id.imag.fr/Laboratoire/Membres/Danjean_Vincent/deb.html#mercurial which shows

Bug#500781: ubuntu/debian repos

2008-10-04 Thread Benoit Boissinot
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Vincent Danjean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hint: if anyone can point me to a specific changeset to fix the second security bug fixed in 1.0.2 (Mercurial before 1.0.2 does not enforce the allowpull permission), I will backport it to 1.0.1 in the next Debian release

Bug#500781: ubuntu/debian repos

2008-10-04 Thread nion
Hi Vincent, * Vincent Danjean [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-04 12:16]: Martin Geisler wrote: [...] But when I look at the Debian site: http://packages.debian.org/etch/mercurial it lists mercurial (0.9.1-1+etch1) which implies an even older version than Ubuntu. The current stable Debian

Bug#500781: ubuntu/debian repos

2008-10-04 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Vincent, * Vincent Danjean [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-04 12:16]: Martin Geisler wrote: Ken Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Hint: if anyone can point me to a specific changeset to fix the second security bug fixed in 1.0.2 (Mercurial before 1.0.2 does not enforce the allowpull