Bug#506042: AGPL freeness bugs until #495721 is resolved

2008-11-25 Thread MJ Ray
Just rounding off a few loose edges. Stopping for reasons explained near the end:- Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > MJ Ray wrote: > > For example, a PHPBB service page is about 20k, while PHPBB source is > > 2.19MiB. > You have a mighty uninteresting forum if people only look a

Bug#506042: AGPL freeness bugs until #495721 is resolved

2008-11-24 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi, thanks for providing this example. MJ Ray wrote: > For example, a PHPBB service page is about 20k, while PHPBB source is > 2.19MiB. You have a mighty uninteresting forum if people only look at a single page. Kidding aside, if 10% of all users download the source once and they average 10 pages

Bug#506042: AGPL freeness bugs until #495721 is resolved

2008-11-24 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, MJ Ray said: > I don't feel that's a comparable problem. It would be reasonable to > track modBSD-license advocates requesting removal of the advertising > clauses with wishlist bugs, wouldn't it? No. -- --

Bug#506042: AGPL freeness bugs until #495721 is resolved

2008-11-24 Thread MJ Ray
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MJ Ray wrote: > > I thank you for your personal view (which will be useful for software > > where you are a licensor), but this is essentially the same anecdotal > > advocacy which has been covered in previous discussions about AGPLv3. > Well, you should

Bug#506042: AGPL freeness bugs until #495721 is resolved

2008-11-24 Thread Thomas Viehmann
MJ Ray wrote: > I thank you for your personal view (which will be useful for software > where you are a licensor), but this is essentially the same anecdotal > advocacy which has been covered in previous discussions about AGPLv3. Well, you should not have raised the topic then. You speculate that a

Bug#506042: AGPL freeness bugs until #495721 is resolved

2008-11-24 Thread MJ Ray
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-11-24 15:06:03.00 MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As it was not a mistake, this bug is not serious, but the desire for > > some users to avoid unlimited download costs remains, so is it OK with > > you if I reopen this bug but downgrade it

Bug#506042: AGPL freeness bugs until #495721 is resolved

2008-11-24 Thread Thomas Viehmann
On 2008-11-24 15:06:03.00 MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > yocto-reader has been accepted into Debian by the FTP team. As this has > > not been an "accident", this means that the working opinion of the FTP > > team is that AGPL meets the DFSG criter

Bug#506042: AGPL freeness bugs until #495721 is resolved

2008-11-24 Thread MJ Ray
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yocto-reader has been accepted into Debian by the FTP team. As this has > not been an "accident", this means that the working opinion of the FTP > team is that AGPL meets the DFSG criteria. > As such, this bug is invalid until the FTP team decision is re