Bug#509879: NMU for azureus

2009-01-05 Thread David Paleino
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:05:59 -0800, Shaun Jackman wrote: > I found the trick. You can start azureus/vuze with the command-line > option -Dforce.ui=az2 to force the classic interface. The `azureus' > executable will do this; the `vuze' executable will not. I'm preparing > an upload now. Thank you f

Bug#509879: NMU for azureus

2009-01-04 Thread Shaun Jackman
2008/12/30 Shaun Jackman : > 2008/12/30 David Paleino : >> I would've gladly done that, if I only knew how to start azureus in >> "classical >> GUI mode" from the command line :) >> >> (tried several classes, I believed it was one of >> org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main >> and ui.jws.Main, but the Vu

Bug#509879: NMU for azureus

2008-12-30 Thread Shaun Jackman
Hi David, > On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:02:56 -0800, Shaun Jackman wrote: ... > The fact is, starting "azureus" effectively fires up the shiny and blinking > Vuze interface. So something's really wrong. ... You're right. That's the crux of the bug. I believe this is fixable. Here's my proposed solutio

Bug#509879: NMU for azureus

2008-12-29 Thread Shaun Jackman
Hi David, Vuze is the dummy package, and azureus is the substantial package. Vuze depends on azureus and additional packages required to run the novel Vuze GUI. Those dependencies are not necessary when using the classical GUI of Azureus. Azureus suggests vuze. Perhaps this should be Recommends. O

Bug#509879: NMU for azureus

2008-12-28 Thread David Paleino
Hello Shawn, do you plan fixing #509878 and #509878? I can prepare a NMU if you don't have time. Also, I saw that debian/control lists "azureus" and "vuze": wouldn't it be better to make azureus a transitional dummy package depending on vuze, and make vuze be the real package? Currently vuze only h