Bug#510919: omake failures (#510919) (and RFS)

2009-01-08 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Evgeni Golov a écrit : BTW, there are many things that shouldn't be in the .orig.tar.gz (such as CVS directories, for a start)... For future releases, it might be relevant to repackage the upstream tarball. Yupp, but thats a different issue, not relevant here and now :) Sorry for the

Bug#510919: omake failures (#510919) (and RFS)

2009-01-07 Thread Stéphane Glondu
I wrote in 4964c23c.7020...@glondu.net: 1. apply the above mentioned patch against ocamldep as brought with ocaml-nox package. That would be pretty dangerous, since ocaml-nox rdeps are exposed at risk. Unlikely to be approved by the release team. It seems the patch has already been

Bug#510919: omake failures (#510919) (and RFS)

2009-01-07 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:29:49 +0100 Stéphane Glondu wrote: As said in git commit bfd1cebf64a424759df083c1fc15276cc9ea3fff: Do not install ocamldep-omake (Closes: #510919) The build system of omake detects by itself that standard ocamldep supports -modules (starting from OCaml 3.10), and

Bug#510919: omake failures (#510919) (and RFS)

2009-01-07 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Evgeni Golov a écrit : Did you also remove the binary from the .orig.tar.gz? We don't have the source for it... No, I didn't. Even though the source is not technically available (in the archive, today), there is an advertised way to rebuild it with only free tools... IMHO, it is not the same

Bug#510919: omake failures (#510919) (and RFS)

2009-01-07 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:05:02 +0100 Stéphane Glondu wrote: Evgeni Golov a écrit : Did you also remove the binary from the .orig.tar.gz? We don't have the source for it... No, I didn't. Even though the source is not technically available (in the archive, today), there is an advertised way